2013/02/22
リスク対策ドットコム英語版>記事
the 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajokull, the most recent eruption to affect the UK, was small. However it caused the biggest disruption to European air travel since WW2 as the position of the eruption was such that it ejected ash into the Jet stream. For 5 days air travel over most of Europe was halted, affecting over 100,000 travelers some of whom resorted to twitter to ask for temporary accommodation and assistance.
The Airline industry was the most severely affected, as with all airspace closed re-booking or rerouting flights was not an option. Hotels and Tourist areas were also impacted as were industries that depended on airfreight. An aviation business continuity expert has kindly shared his views on best practice gained from the experience of 2010. 1. Government Agencies need to have available Ash Cloud Forecasting and Monitoring Equipments. The aircraft which usually fly over UK to measure the density and distribution of ash at various levels of altitude, was unfortunately parked in a hanger for maintenance. 2. The national air traffic service should have a BC plan in place to deal with loss of airspace availability for any reason. All affected parties should work together on a national plan. The National Air Traffic Service (NATS) had declared the flow rates in various ATC (Air Traffic Control) sectors throughout UK that it could provide service to. The airlines agreed on a pro rata these flow rates among themselves based on their normal level of traffic and thus make their own decisions about which flights to operate or cancel. 3. Priority should be given to flights which have few alternatives, over those where alternatives do exist. e.g. where good road and rail networks exist, domestic flights should be cancelled in order to allow long-haul overseas flights to operate where capacity is severely reduced. However for this to work, it will be necessary to arrange for extra coach and train services to be laid on to cope with the additional passengers and likewise extra road haulage for essential cargo. 4. Government meteorologists and airline flight planners should be working together. Enabling airline planners to understand the most likely spread of ash cloud at various levels and consider alternative routings for flights to avoid the ash or fly at sub optimal flight levels (from a fuel efficiency point of view). Where the rerouting is significant and beyond an aircraft's range, the airlines should consider en route stops for fuel uplift. This may result in crew flight time limitation issues, the need for additional catering uplift etc and arrangements will need to be in hand (eg handling agreements where such calls are at airports not normally used by the airline). 5. The Government should not seek to set airline priorities, just inform airlines of which airspace is considered safe. There will likely be issues raised about such things as should business traffic get priority over leisure traffic. These are pointless and agreement will not be reached. If the Government makes such a decision it will render itself liable to claims for compensation by the aggrieved parties. Wholly leisure airlines would be threatened with bankruptcy etc. Priority should be given to flights which have few alternatives, over those where alternatives do exist. 6. Finally, even the best business continuity planning will not enable normal operations in circumstance with wide spread impact. There will be mass disruption in the form of delays and cancellations and the planning must include how such widespread disruption will be managed.●This article was translated into Japanese and published on magazine "Risk-taisaku.com"
vol.35.
◆Profile Samantha Ueno, TIEMS Social Media Manager. Presently studying MPhil Technology Policy at University of Cambridge (Judges Business School). Voluntarily run the Social Media communication strategy of The International Emergency Management Society (www.TIEMS.info). "Samantha's BCP English" has been serialized in the Risk-taisaku.com magazine. Her current interests is on Technology and Organisational Reliance.
リスク対策ドットコム英語版>記事の他の記事
- An ‘App’ for everything; But can Apps for Disaster save lives?
- Once upon a time in Fukushima
- UK experience of the Impact of Volcanic Eruptions
- BS25999 Certification Is No Guarantee of a Robust, Fit-for-purpose Business Continuity Capability
- A need to re-think the trade-off between continuity and productivity
おすすめ記事
-
-
-
「ビジネスイネーブラー」へ進化するセキュリティ組織
昨年、累計出品数が40億を突破し、流通取引総額が1兆円を超えたフリマアプリ「メルカリ」。オンラインサービス上では日々膨大な数の取引が行われています。顧客の利便性や従業員の生産性を落とさず、安全と信頼を高めるセキュリティ戦略について、執行役員CISOの市原尚久氏に聞きました。
2025/06/29
-
中澤・木村が斬る!今週のニュース解説
毎週火曜日(平日のみ)朝9時~、リスク対策.com編集長 中澤幸介と兵庫県立大学教授 木村玲欧氏(心理学・危機管理学)が今週注目のニュースを短く、わかりやすく解説します。
2025/06/24
-
-
-
柔軟性と合理性で守る職場ハイブリッド勤務時代の“リアル”な改善
比較サイトの先駆けである「価格.com」やユーザー評価を重視した飲食店検索サイトの「食べログ」を運営し、現在は20を超えるサービスを提供するカカクコム(東京都渋谷区、村上敦浩代表取締役社長)。同社は新型コロナウイルス流行による出社率の低下をきっかけに、発災時に機能する防災体制に向けて改善に取り組んだ。誰が出社しているかわからない状況に対応するため、柔軟な組織づくりやマルチタスク化によるリスク分散など効果を重視した防災対策を進めている。
2025/06/20
-
サイバーセキュリティを経営層に響かせよ
デジタル依存が拡大しサイバーリスクが増大する昨今、セキュリティ対策は情報資産や顧客・従業員を守るだけでなく、DXを加速させていくうえでも必須の取り組みです。これからの時代に求められるセキュリティマネジメントのあり方とは、それを組織にどう実装させるのか。東海大学情報通信学部教授で学部長の三角育生氏に聞きました。
2025/06/17
-
-
入居ビルの耐震性から考える初動対策退避場所への移動を踏まえたマニュアル作成
押入れ産業は、「大地震時の初動マニュアル」を完成させた。リスクの把握からスタートし、現実的かつ実践的な災害対策を模索。ビルの耐震性を踏まえて2つの避難パターンを盛り込んだ。防災備蓄品を整備し、各種訓練を実施。社内説明会を繰り返し開催し、防災意識の向上に取り組むなど着実な進展をみせている。
2025/06/13
※スパム投稿防止のためコメントは編集部の承認制となっておりますが、いただいたコメントは原則、すべて掲載いたします。
※個人情報は入力しないようご注意ください。
» パスワードをお忘れの方