2013/02/22
リスク対策ドットコム英語版>記事
the 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajokull, the most recent eruption to affect the UK, was small. However it caused the biggest disruption to European air travel since WW2 as the position of the eruption was such that it ejected ash into the Jet stream. For 5 days air travel over most of Europe was halted, affecting over 100,000 travelers some of whom resorted to twitter to ask for temporary accommodation and assistance.
The Airline industry was the most severely affected, as with all airspace closed re-booking or rerouting flights was not an option. Hotels and Tourist areas were also impacted as were industries that depended on airfreight. An aviation business continuity expert has kindly shared his views on best practice gained from the experience of 2010. 1. Government Agencies need to have available Ash Cloud Forecasting and Monitoring Equipments. The aircraft which usually fly over UK to measure the density and distribution of ash at various levels of altitude, was unfortunately parked in a hanger for maintenance. 2. The national air traffic service should have a BC plan in place to deal with loss of airspace availability for any reason. All affected parties should work together on a national plan. The National Air Traffic Service (NATS) had declared the flow rates in various ATC (Air Traffic Control) sectors throughout UK that it could provide service to. The airlines agreed on a pro rata these flow rates among themselves based on their normal level of traffic and thus make their own decisions about which flights to operate or cancel. 3. Priority should be given to flights which have few alternatives, over those where alternatives do exist. e.g. where good road and rail networks exist, domestic flights should be cancelled in order to allow long-haul overseas flights to operate where capacity is severely reduced. However for this to work, it will be necessary to arrange for extra coach and train services to be laid on to cope with the additional passengers and likewise extra road haulage for essential cargo. 4. Government meteorologists and airline flight planners should be working together. Enabling airline planners to understand the most likely spread of ash cloud at various levels and consider alternative routings for flights to avoid the ash or fly at sub optimal flight levels (from a fuel efficiency point of view). Where the rerouting is significant and beyond an aircraft's range, the airlines should consider en route stops for fuel uplift. This may result in crew flight time limitation issues, the need for additional catering uplift etc and arrangements will need to be in hand (eg handling agreements where such calls are at airports not normally used by the airline). 5. The Government should not seek to set airline priorities, just inform airlines of which airspace is considered safe. There will likely be issues raised about such things as should business traffic get priority over leisure traffic. These are pointless and agreement will not be reached. If the Government makes such a decision it will render itself liable to claims for compensation by the aggrieved parties. Wholly leisure airlines would be threatened with bankruptcy etc. Priority should be given to flights which have few alternatives, over those where alternatives do exist. 6. Finally, even the best business continuity planning will not enable normal operations in circumstance with wide spread impact. There will be mass disruption in the form of delays and cancellations and the planning must include how such widespread disruption will be managed.●This article was translated into Japanese and published on magazine "Risk-taisaku.com"
vol.35.
◆Profile Samantha Ueno, TIEMS Social Media Manager. Presently studying MPhil Technology Policy at University of Cambridge (Judges Business School). Voluntarily run the Social Media communication strategy of The International Emergency Management Society (www.TIEMS.info). "Samantha's BCP English" has been serialized in the Risk-taisaku.com magazine. Her current interests is on Technology and Organisational Reliance.
リスク対策ドットコム英語版>記事の他の記事
- An ‘App’ for everything; But can Apps for Disaster save lives?
- Once upon a time in Fukushima
- UK experience of the Impact of Volcanic Eruptions
- BS25999 Certification Is No Guarantee of a Robust, Fit-for-purpose Business Continuity Capability
- A need to re-think the trade-off between continuity and productivity
おすすめ記事
-
-
現場対応を起点に従業員の自主性促すBCP
神戸から京都まで、2府1県で主要都市を結ぶ路線バスを運行する阪急バス。阪神・淡路大震災では、兵庫県芦屋市にある芦屋浜営業所で液状化が発生し、建物や車両も被害を受けた。路面状況が悪化している中、迂回しながら神戸市と西宮市を結ぶ路線を6日後の23日から再開。鉄道網が寸断し、地上輸送を担える交通機関はバスだけだった。それから30年を経て、運転手が自立した対応ができるように努めている。
2025/02/20
-
能登半島地震の対応を振り返る~機能したことは何か、課題はどこにあったのか?~
地震で崩落した山の斜面(2024年1月 穴水町)能登半島地震の発生から1年、被災した自治体では、一連の災害対応の検証作業が始まっている。今回、石川県で災害対応の中核を担った飯田重則危機管理監に、改めて発災当初の判断や組織運営の実態を振り返ってもらった。
2025/02/20
-
-
2度の大震災を乗り越えて生まれた防災文化
「ダンロップ」ブランドでタイヤ製造を手がける住友ゴム工業の本社と神戸工場は、兵庫県南部地震で経験のない揺れに襲われた。勤務中だった150人の従業員は全員無事に避難できたが、神戸工場が閉鎖に追い込まれる壊滅的な被害を受けた。30年の節目にあたる今年1月23日、同社は5年ぶりに阪神・淡路大震災の関連社内イベントを開催。次世代に経験と教訓を伝えた。
2025/02/19
-
阪神・淡路大震災30年「いま」に寄り添う <西宮市>
西宮震災記念碑公園では、犠牲者追悼之碑を前に手を合わせる人たちが続いていた。ときおり吹き付ける風と小雨の合間に青空が顔をのぞかせる寒空であっても、名前の刻まれた銘板を訪ねる人は、途切れることはなかった。
2025/02/19
-
阪神・淡路大震災30年語り継ぐ あの日
阪神・淡路大震災で、神戸市に次ぐ甚大な被害が発生した西宮市。1146人が亡くなり、6386人が負傷。6万棟以上の家屋が倒壊した。現在、兵庫県消防設備保守協会で事務局次長を務める長畑武司氏は、西宮市消防局に務め北夙川消防分署で小隊長として消火活動や救助活動に奔走したひとり。当時の経験と自衛消防組織に求めるものを聞いた。
2025/02/19
-
-
リスク対策.com編集長が斬る!今週のニュース解説
毎週火曜日(平日のみ)朝9時~、リスク対策.com編集長 中澤幸介と兵庫県立大学教授 木村玲欧氏(心理学・危機管理学)が今週注目のニュースを短く、わかりやすく解説します。
2025/02/18
-
※スパム投稿防止のためコメントは編集部の承認制となっておりますが、いただいたコメントは原則、すべて掲載いたします。
※個人情報は入力しないようご注意ください。
» パスワードをお忘れの方